In any disputes, NEWLEX first seeks to resolve them peacefully.
Our policy is that it is almost always possible to negotiate.
Help you to conduct difficult negotiations
It is always difficult to find a way out of the situation through communication in order to find a solution that will suit all parties, but we cope with this task, mediation is our forte
Extensive experience in mediation dispute resolution
We have experience working as an independent mediator as a mediator in the settlement of a conflict in order to develop a final solution by the parties to the dispute, which will not infringe on either side
We know how to bring the conflict to a peaceful course
In many cases, we managed to direct the conflict to a peaceful course, not to bring the resolution of the dispute to the courts, thereby saving time, nerves and money
Gravirov Nikolai
Managing Partner
Experience more than 15 years
Key skills:
Graduated from the Moscow State Industrial University, as well as the Russian Academy of Justice.
Legal practice for more than 15 years.
Expert in the field of contractual, corporate, international, as well as judicial block.
A professional mediator, and a specialist in pre-trial dispute resolution and support of complex negotiation processes.
Practicing arbitrator.
Paleyeva Maria
Chief Specialist in Judicial Work
Experience more than 6 years
Key skills:
Graduated from the Bachelor's degree of the Faculty of Law of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation with honors, as well as the Master's degree of the Faculty of Law of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation in the direction of "Lawyer in the field of financial control".
Extensive practical knowledge of both public and private law.
In-depth knowledge in the field of financial control.
The main specialization is the preparation and development of corporate documentation, procedural documents, interaction with government agencies.
Tatiana Soyuzova
Partner in the accounting field
Experience more than 25 years
Key skills:
Vladimir Bogdanov
Director of Sales and Marketing Department
Experience more than 7 years
Key skills:
Pre—trial settlement of disputes in Moscow is the best way out in a conflict situation. Judicial proceedings with high reliability of the results of the case, however, require time and expense. If it is possible to avoid it, it is better to do it.
Perhaps it is worth coming to an agreement, finding a reasonable compromise with the opponent. An experienced lawyer can become an intermediary — he will conduct the necessary negotiations and help to legally correctly consolidate the agreements reached.
In addition, the Arbitration Court, in principle, does not accept the case for consideration if the claim form of pre-trial settlement has not been sustained. Simply put, in any case, you are obliged to file a claim to your opponent before proceeding to the stage of the actual trial.
However, pre-trial settlement lawyers are very well aware: a written claim with unclear templates downloaded from the Internet does not lead to the desired result. The opponent thinks that you are not serious and does not give an answer to such a document.
But even a well-written claim is usually not enough. It is better to back up the intention to go to court with a qualitatively conducted negotiation process. Unfortunately, people are prone to emotions, often a decision made in an outburst of anger or out of resentment is not the best decision.
In addition, a non-lawyer usually rests on such arguments as “it's not fair”, “you can't do that", “not humanly". Whereas in negotiations it is necessary to focus on legal norms and the consequences of their violation. Mediation is a widespread service in Europe, which is gaining popularity in the CIS countries, so our team includes specialists in the field of mediation. Since an experienced mediator is the key to success in the pre-trial settlement of a dispute.
This is an opportunity not to lose, but to win - and for each participant in the conflict. There is probably a solution that suits both sides of the dispute. It's just that it's not always visible FROM the INSIDE of the conflict. Requires an outside view.
For example, you demand a refund for violating the terms of the contract. But perhaps it's worth listening to the opposing side? It turns out that the subcontractor is to blame for the failure of deadlines and violation of conditions. It is better to give time to correct the error than to start a trial with a dubious result (just bring your opponent to bankruptcy with demands, and he will not be able to pay anything).
If, after negotiations, it was possible to find an option that suits everyone, the participation of a lawyer is also necessary - he will record the agreements reached in a special agreement. This is a document that has legal force. But if a compromise has not been found, and you have not received an answer to the claim, you can go to court.
The cost of pre-trial settlement of the dispute is small. And it's always worth trying this option first.
Contact us